I was not going to make any comment with
regard to the article published in the Puerto Rican newspaper El Nuevo Día a
few days ago entitled: "¿What does the Jew want with the colony?"
However, I have to do it. From this repugnant article, we only get one thing:
antisemitism is not dead. Neither in Brooklyn, nor in the Arab world, nor
certain sectors of the regressive left in Puerto Rico. This article is
disgusting from beginning to end, and only resembles the text of the Protocols
of the Elders of Zion. This anti-Semitic document, created by the tsarist
intelligence services to defame the Jews in the Russian Empire and propagated
by the Nazis as the exact reason why the Jews want to "take over the
world," is not at all different from the article published by El Nuevo
Día. Before all this, I just want to say that I personally thank El Nuevo Día
for publishing this article because they made clear what their position is with
regard to those who have financed their work. Because they made clear what is
their position with regard to the conflict. By publishing that reprehensible
article, they lost credibility. Something that is complicated to gain back.
Thus, let me show you why El Nuevo Día
and its anti-Semitic article is a total fallacy. Because this article not only
exalted and promoted anti-Semitism, but also presented the Jews as 'the cause
of everything'. Let me show you my perspective using the Arab/
Palestinian-Israeli
conflict as a reference. Without a doubt, I am not a fan of Benjamin Netanyahu
(Bibi) when it comes to domestic issues in Israel. I think the cases of
corruption that he has had (like the one in 1997) and the ones he is being
investigated right now (cases 1000, 2000 and 3000) are all reprehensible. Also,
the controversies of his son Yair-which undoubtedly have made clear the corrupt
image of his father, shows that Bibi is not a serious public server. These acts
confirm that using politics to maintain a "social level" and exert
control over others is an option in life. However, when it comes to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict or talking about regional issues, Netanyahu is
more reasonable and realistic.
With the recent moves that President Trump
has made with respect to moving the US embassy to Jerusalem (personally, I do
not think it was the right moment for this without a peace plan proposal),
which undoubtedly have helped Bibi politically, or actively strengthening
Israeli diplomacy around the world, are just two good examples of what the
current prime minister has achieved internationally since 2009. These facts
have both bothered the Arabs, but also the Palestinians a lot. That is why we
see how irrelevant countries-in terms of international influence-such as
Honduras or Guatemala opposing a UN resolution on December 21, 2017, which
rejected Trump’s administration decision of moving the US Embassy in Tel-Aviv
to Jerusalem. Since then, the Arab world and the Palestinians have gone crazy.
They are worried because they know that the Israelis are expanding their
influence not only in Latin America, but also in Africa.
On the other hand, it seems hypocritical
to me that the Arabs, the Palestinians, and even the Turks, are now acting like
if they were the only ones who have always supported the Palestinians. Sadly,
they forget that during the Invasion of Kuwait in 1991 the Gulf Arab States
expelled the Palestinians from their borders when Yasser Arafat decided to
support Saddam Hussein. It’s demagogic that every time that the Palestinians
hoard international media attention the Arab League and its member states
attack Israel with a very anti-Semitic and aggressive rhetoric. Nonetheless,
they do nothing to sanction countries such as Syria and Lebanon who for the
past 70 years have not granted yet their citizenship and labor rights to the
Palestinian refugees.
I find it sad that Mahmoud Abbas (Abu
Mazen) attacks Israel and the US while expends $350 million dollars on paying
salaries to relatives of Palestinians who have attacked or killed Israelis.
It’s hypocritical when Abu Mazen aberrantly says to President Trump ‘May your
house be destroyed’, but says nothing about the more than 3,500 Palestinians
who have died in the Syrian Civil War. It’s frustrating when Abu Mazen actively
denies history but sadly this is what the Palestinian have done throughout
history. Before the Six Day War, they only claimed as their future state what
was Israel before the military conflict. After the war, they also started
claiming the West Bank which the Jordanians opposed, and that is why until 1988
the Hashemite Kingdom claimed that territorial strip as part of their land.
Today, and although Israel has military presence in the West Bank, this
territory no longer claimed by Jordan, is not occupied. Therefore, the Fourth
Geneva Convention is not applicable to the West Bank. However, the lies of the
Arab world and the Palestinians present another "reality", a very distorted
one.
Undoubtedly, it can be affirmed that
Palestinians today do not want to recognize that their "national
identity" was really forged in the refugee camps and not in what was the
British Mandate of Palestine. Why do I say this? Because it is in the refugee
camps where the Palestinians developed their political stuctures and where the
different Palestinian paramilitary groups developed. Or do we have to ignore
the Jordanian Civil War that the Palestinians caused in 1970? Although I
believe in a two-state solution (a Palestinian state composed of Gaza and a
good portion of the West Bank, and another Israeli with the same borders it had
before the Six Day War, a portion of the West Bank and the entire Jordan
Valley) with Israeli-Palestinian co-sovereignty in East Jerusalem, I think that
today there is no solution to this conflict. This reality is painful, but when
you have countries such as Turkey-the first ever Muslim country to recognize
Israel in 1949-, financially and militarily supporting terrorist groups like
Hamas, peace moves away. It seems sad to me that in the 21st century, both
Arabs and Palestinians condemn the expression of the Minister of Foreign
Affairs of Lebanon, Gebran Bassil, for recognizing Israel's right to exist.
It’s a contradictory position that the
Arab world supports the Palestinians when they have problems at home (an
example of this is the conflict that Hezbollah has with the Lebanese Sunnis) or
when the latter needs help to attack the United States because of their pro-Israel
tendency. But then, the Palestinians complain when the US decides to freeze $65
million to the United Nations Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Middle East
(UNRWA). The overwhelming rhetoric of the "Israeli occupation had caused
so much pain" is the supreme argument among the international press, at
the cost of forgetting the pain of the more than 850,000 Jews who were expelled
from the Arab countries after the establishment of the State of Israel. It’s
mostly forgotten that in 1950, 25% of the population of Baghdad was Jewish.
Nonetheless, the following year it was only 1%. Why? Because the Iraqis passed
legislation in which they explicitly “asked the Jews who were not faithful to
the country to leave." Perhaps my arguments are not convincing or pleasing
to everyone. But what I am sure of is that the double standard that the
Palestinians and the Arabs have over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is
overpowering.
Just as the Arabs and the Palestinians
have sought to distort history and promote anti-Semitism in order to achieve
their desire to ignore the Jewish past of their lands and the realty that
Israel is today, the article published by El Nuevo Día also promotes
anti-Semitism and gives way to the hatred existing against the State of Israel.
Although predominantly the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish religious branch rejects the
State of Israel because it is not an entity created by the Messiah, the Jews
are linked and will always going to be linked to the State of Israel. Even if
we want it or not, its foundation on May 14, 1948 was the greatest collective
accomplishment that as a people we achieved during the 20th century. However,
the resentment promoted by the Arabs, the Palestinians and most recently by El
Nuevo Día, was done in the most repulsive way: through lying. So it is at this
core point that also the Arab world, the Palestinians and El Nuevo Día have
resorted for the past years to forget that, for example, Arab/Palestinian
leaders like the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni, supported the
Nazis. They appeal to the xenophobic, divisive and hurtful practices they carry
out in an attempt to defame the Jews. It is this trident, full of antipathy and
anger, that defines us as "usurpers of the world economy", at the
mercy of forgetting the more than 40,000 Jews who died during the crusades or
the 25 years of military service to which the Jews were obligated to serve
under the tsarist empire. Are the Arabs, the
Palestinians and El Nuevo Día the ones who forgets history to try, in an
impermissible way, to foster a message of hate that no longer fits in the 21st
century. However, it is not the first time that before an economic crisis we
have been accused of all the evils that that society lives.
The article published by El Nuevo Día,
as well as the recent Arab and Palestinian positions within the framework of
the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict, have the same traits as the anti-Semitic
regimes that caused harm and pain to the Jewish people throughout the entire
twentieth century. Forgetting is easy. But truth is necessary when slander,
rancor, dishonesty and falsehood invades our hearts.
No comments:
Post a Comment